{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Lavender Law","provider_url":"https:\/\/lgbtqbar.org\/annual","title":"Religiosity in Public Life: The Far Reaching Implications of 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis - Lavender Law","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kSByJltbOl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/lgbtqbar.org\/annual\/conference-workshops\/scotus-religious-case\/\">Religiosity in Public Life: The Far Reaching Implications of <i>303 Creative LLC v. Elenis<\/i><\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/lgbtqbar.org\/annual\/conference-workshops\/scotus-religious-case\/embed\/#?secret=kSByJltbOl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Religiosity in Public Life: The Far Reaching Implications of &lt;i&gt;303 Creative LLC v. Elenis&lt;\/i&gt;&#8221; &#8212; Lavender Law\" data-secret=\"kSByJltbOl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/lgbtqbar.org\/annual\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Supreme Court has developed a track record in recent years of ruling in favor of claimants seeking freedom to defy religiously neutral laws of general applicability for religious reasons, sometimes together with free speech reasons.\u00a0 In addition to the religious claimants\u2019 notable winning streak, the pattern of decisions also is characterized by rejection of [&hellip;]","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/lgbtqbar.org\/annual\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/\/sites\/9\/2026\/03\/LL26-Logo-FIN1.jpg","thumbnail_width":1,"thumbnail_height":1}