The schedule shown below was for Lavender Law® 2020. The conference schedule for Lavender Law® 2021 will be announced in the coming weeks. Please keep an eye on our emails for more details.
As part of Lavender Law® 2020, all conference registrants have access to nearly fifty 90-minute CLE programs until December 31.
Please scroll down to the ‘On-Demand’ section in the table below to view program descriptions and speakers. If you previously registered for the conference, please log into the conference platform in the link that was emailed to you and click on ‘On-Demand Programming’ in the Auditorium to view available sessions.
CLE Reporting Information
Please note that while you are welcome to watch as many on-demand programs as you would like, you may claim up to 6 programs for CLE credit. CLE reporting forms have now been sent to all conference attendees. For questions regarding CLE accreditation or help with accessing the conference platform, please email Maddie Ivanovich at maddie@lgbtqbar.org.
Event | Speakers |
---|---|
Caucuses and Affiliate Meetings See the description of each caucus or affiliate meeting for dates and times. | |
Bi Caucus Sunday, August 16, 1:00pm-2:30pm Eastern. BiLaw is an informal group of bisexual-identified and bi-allied attorneys, academics, and law students. The BiLaw Caucus is an opportunity to network with other bi-identified lawyers and discuss areas of the law relevant to bisexual people. All bi-identified and bi-allied attorneys, academics, and law students are encouraged to attend. Following a brief meet-and-greet, the organizers will provide a structured discussion based on attendees’ priorities. Not for CLE credit. | Heron Greenesmith (Political Research Associates) |
Law Student Congress and Law School Affiliate Caucus Saturday, August 22, 3:00pm-4:30pm Eastern. Come meet with fellow law students, connect with your 2020-2021 Law Student Congress board leadership, and be part of the decision-making process about how to make an impact on law school campuses and in your communities. Not for CLE credit. | Emily Hansbarger (Charleston School of Law) Mari Nemec (James E. Rogers College of Law) |
Legal Aid/Legal Services Caucus Monday, August 17, 1:00pm-2:30pm Eastern. This interactive caucus provides attorneys an opportunity to network with other legal services advocates, and discuss emerging issues that impact low-income LGBT clients. Topics may include challenges to outreach, successful community partnerships, best intake practices, special needs of the transgender community, increasing cultural competency, and strategies for navigating the changing socio-political climate. All advocates that provide services to low-income clients are invited to participate. Not for CLE credit. | Amy Nelson (Whitman-Walker) Shinming Wong (National Center for Lesbian Rights) |
LGBTQ+ State and Local Bar Affiliate Congress Caucus Thursday, August 20, 3:00pm-4:30pm Eastern. All representatives of LGBTQ+ state and local Bar Association affiliate groups are invited to attend this annual caucus meeting. The first half hour of the meeting will address National LGBT Bar and affiliate business matters; the remaining time will be spent in a brainstorming/information-sharing format. We will address affiliates' questions on topics including compliance, administration, communications techniques and strategies, programming, law student engagement, event planning and execution, and fundraising techniques and strategies. Guest speaker attorneys from Equality Ohio will lead a discussion regarding how state and local bars can effectively and efficiently add legal clinics to their work. Not for CLE credit. | Jessica Hernandez (Alcock & Associates, P.C.) Emily Meyer (Equality Ohio Legal Clinic) Kate Mozynski (Equality Ohio Legal Clinic) Judi O'Kelley (National LGBT Bar Association and Foundation) |
Prosecutor Caucus Saturday, August 22, 1:00pm-2:30pm Eastern. The Prosecutor’s Caucus is an informal community of LGBTQ+ prosecutors. It provides an opportunity to network and discuss LGBTQ+ issues in the criminal justice system. This year’s caucus will discuss racial equity in the criminal justice system; the role of LGBTQ+ prosecutors in criminal prosecution; deferred prosecution alternatives; and the vicarious trauma of LGBTQ+ attorneys in public service. Not for CLE credit. | Michael Pattarozzi (Cook County State's Attorney's Office) Elizabeth "Biz" Reilly (Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office) Marcel Taylor (Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office) |
Judge Leadership Meeting (Day 2) To be held Saturday, August 15, 11:30-2:30pm Eastern. | |
IALGBTQ+J Leadership Meeting (Day 2) Not for CLE credit. | TBA |
Judicial Nuts & Bolts Academy To be held Saturday, August 15, 2:00-5:00pm Eastern. | |
Nuts & Bolts Academy for Judicial Candidates The LGBT Bar’s “Nuts & Bolts Academy for Judicial Candidates” seeks to provide interested legal professionals with the tools they need to end up on the other side of the bench. This intensive workshop welcomes legal professionals from all backgrounds and parts of the country, as the LGBT Bar believes diverse perspectives bring diverse experiences to the bench – and diverse experiences lead to better judgments. Invitation is required. Please see the Judicial Nuts & Bolts page for more information and to apply to attend (applications close August 5). Not for CLE credit. | Judge Tara Flanagan (Superior Court of the State of California) Judge Mike Jacobs (State of Georgia) Judge Larnzell Martin Jr. (Prince George's County, MD Circuit Court) Justice Sabrina McKenna (Hawai'i Supreme Court) |
LEAD Academy To be held Tuesday, August 11, 12:00-4:00pm Eastern. | |
LEAD Academy This Academy is designed to provide engaged LGBTQ+ and ally law students with the tools they need to create change in and through the legal profession. Invitation is required. Please see the LEAD Academy page for more information and to apply to attend (applications close August 1). Not for CLE credit. | TBA |
On Demand Available on our platform from August 12, 2020 through December 31, 2020. | |
Addressing Racial Equity within the LGBTQ+ Legal Community While awareness of racial inequities in American society, including within the legal profession, has dramatically increased over the spring and summer of 2020, the underlying inequities are far from a new phenomenon. Our own beautiful, diverse LGBTQ+ legal community is often perceived by others as being solely a white community, disregarding the needs and interests of LGBTQ+ lawyers and law students of color; moreover, the legal movement for LGBTQ+ equality is too-often internally driven solely or heavily by white leadership, with insufficient attention paid to issues that disproportionately impact Black, Brown, and Indigenous LGBTQ+ people. Each of us has a unique and urgent role to play in dismantling white supremacy within our own movement and within our own places of work. Join us during our live program on Wednesday, August 12 for this featured plenary of esteemed speakers from different legal sectors to learn more about the racial inequities within the legal community as a whole as well as the challenges specific to our own LGBTQ+ legal community. Our panelists will also, importantly, discuss techniques that we all can implement or advocate for within our workplaces to make tangible impact to dismantle biased systems. Moderated by Justice McKenna. | Taylor Brown (ACLU) Bendita Cynthia Malakia (Hogan Lovells) Justice Sabrina McKenna (Hawai'i Supreme Court) Robert Raben (The Raben Group) |
Administrative Law 2.0: 360 Degree Picture of Government Action Administrative law is a helpful tool for clients and advocates to move national policy. You might wonder, "how can administrative law help?" But the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the law around how the government creates regulations, is a useful tool for achieving policy and client goals through the regulatory process. The last year has shown that these tools are only becoming more important in advancing good policy and fighting off bad policy. If a client or colleague asks in outrage, "Can the federal government do that?" the answer is often found in administrative law. Our workshop aims to give attendees an inside look on how rulemaking gets done and the tools to defend against improper or unjust government actions. The workshop will begin with a brief overview of the nuts-and-bolts of rulemaking and a discussion of administrative law tools that are at the lawyer's disposal. The workshop will primarily focus on more advanced ways that administrative law can work by having hands-on case studies in which attendees will be asked to use those tools to find creative ways to win their case or achieve their client's goal. | Sasha Buchert (Lambda Legal) Barbara Jones (AARP Foundation) Judge Kristin Rosi (California Department of Insurance) Samuel Pearson-Moore (U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development) |
Aging and End-of-Life Legal Issues in the Transgender Community The US population is rapidly aging, at the same time as more people understand themselves to be transgender or non-binary (TNB). Are our legal systems, housing supports, and long-term care system prepared to provide person-centered care to TNB people as we age? We will ground our discussion with an attorney elder in the movement for transgender justice. The panel will present efforts to reduce the scope of state religious exemption laws and to strengthen state/local anti-discrimination protections for TNB elders in elder-specific medical and housing settings. We will discuss new state/local policies that recognize X gender markers on death certificates. A trusts and estates attorney will share her legal approach to counseling TNB people, and we will offer specific durable healthcare power of attorney provisions to protect TNB people's access to hormones and use of affirmed name, gender, and pronouns, after cognitive decline. Workshop participants will have a deeper understanding of how traditional aging supports, including the law, may be problematized for people of TNB experience. | Kylar Broadus (Trans People of Color Coalition) Paula Kohut (Kohut & Adams, P.A.) Ashe McGovern (NYC Unity Project) Ames Simmons (Equality North Carolina) |
Alternatives to Litigation: Tools to Advocate for Trans and Nonbinary Rights In the face of an increasingly hostile federal judiciary, affirmative and impact litigation cannot be our only avenue for vindicating civil rights. This panel explores the many tools that transgender and nonbinary individuals can use instead of the lengthy and uncertain path of litigation. We will share vital and practical information on how to use Structured Negotiation, an alternative dispute resolution mechanism with a non-adversarial mindset; how to file complaints to pursue rights and benefits with administrative agencies; and other helpful information on how to help trans and nonbinary people navigate legal and administrative systems to get their needs met. | Arli Christian (ACLU) Noah Lewis (Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund) Krisztina Szabo (Whitman-Walker Health) Jessie Workman (New York City Commission on Human Rights) |
Better Lawyering Through Mindfulness Is your mind constantly going at 150 mph? Do you find yourself wasting precious time thinking about the past or worrying about the future? Do you struggle to keep your attention on a task? Are you always multitasking, unable to focus? Is stress or anxiety keeping you from doing your best work? Mindfulness and meditation practice is the key to increasing focus and productivity! In this interactive workshop, you'll learn: the latest research on lawyer burnout, stress (including minority stress), anxiety, depression, and other issues lawyers face; effective tools for stress and anxiety management; understanding the stress response - distinguishing between good stress and bad stress; how mindfulness can decrease distractions and increase productivity; simple practices you can incorporate into your day to let go of stress and return to homeostasis; increasing awareness and noticing when you're distracted; tips for increasing focus and productivity; using mindfulness and meditation to work with the inner-critic and let go of unproductive thought patterns; and the importance of self-care and caring for your well-being. | Jeena Cho (JC Law Group PC) Noah Lewis (Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund) Laura Maechtlen (Seyfarth Shaw LLP) |
Beyond the “Litigation” Mindset: How to Effectuate Lasting Change Inside and Outside the Courtroom in Hostile Jurisdictions In this workshop, attendees will learn robust alternative methods to accomplish effective LGBTQ+ Civil Rights work in unfavorable jurisdictions, states and courts. Panelists will discuss how to develop new viewpoints for identifying, creating, and implementing comprehensive long-term strategies to ensure full and lived equality for your clients, regardless of where you are doing the work. We will work to develop a deeper understanding of how your perspective may be limiting your ability to think creatively on behalf of your clients’ best interests prior to, during, and after the litigation process. We will discuss how to deal effectively with uncertainty, and develop a willingness to think outside of the box when representing LGBTQ+ clients in hostile environments. | Nancy Abudu (Southern Poverty Law Center) Taylor Brown (ACLU) Kevin Hall (Womble, Bond, Dickinson LLP) Eric Paulk (Georgia Equality) Shelly Skeen (Lambda Legal) |
Born Perfect: The Journey from Saving Alex to Ban Conversion Therapy in Utah This seminar will tell a remarkable story of transformation. Within the space of a decade, the State of Utah moved from defending conversion therapy to banning it. The lessons learned from this journey show that if it can happen in Utah, conversion therapy can be banned everywhere. Ten years ago, Alex Cooper was sent by her parents to be tortured in an effort to change her sexual orientation. The State of Utah defended her parents' supposed right to determine their daughter's sexual orientation. The State of Utah also challenged Cooper's right to be represented by a lawyer of her own choosing. Cooper prevailed in an extended legal battle and obtained a trailblazing court order that established her right to live as an openly gay teenager, prohibited her parents from subjecting her to conversion therapy, and affirmed her right to date girls. After assisting with Cooper's case, the National Center for Lesbian Rights launched its Born Perfect campaign to ban conversion therapy across the country. Equality Utah, led by its Executive Director Troy Williams, took on Utah's political and ecclesiastical establishments to promote a ban on conversion therapy. The process included negotiating with adversaries, recruiting allies, a high-profile resignation from a task force that dominated the headlines in Utah for a week. The proposed ban began as a legislative proposal and ultimately became law in January 2020 by executive action. | Paul Burke (Ray Quinney & Nebeker P.C.) Alex Cooper Shannon Minter (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Troy Williams (Equality Utah) |
Breaking Down More Than Just Trade Barriers: The Inclusion of Human Rights Provisions in Free Trade Agreements At the end of 2018, the United States, Mexico, and Canada agreed to include a provision promoting the inclusion of LGBTQ+ people in the workforce in a new trade agreement - the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The inclusion of this provision was a first of its kind in any free trade agreement (FTA), but follows a recent trend of including provisions that promote human rights. For example, the USMCA also includes provisions promoting and protecting workers, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership includes provisions promoting women. Although these provisions go beyond the foundational purpose of FTAs - to facilitate trade and eliminate trade barriers - they are a recognition that international trade policies have significant spillover effects and therefore cannot be considered in a vacuum. Come learn about an alternative tool and unique lens to address human rights considerations. The workshop will explore human rights provisions in FTAs, including LGBTQ+ related provisions, and the inclusion of such provisions in future trade agreements. As part of the workshop, experts in the field will provide an overview of FTAs, including their enforcement mechanisms, and will discuss how FTAs compare to other international treaties and agreements that have been the primary bases of promoting human rights in the international arena. As part of this discussion, the panelists will consider the effectiveness of human rights provisions in FTAs, and whether FTAs should include such provisions. The workshop is intended for audiences with all levels of knowledge of international trade law and will include foundational introductions to each issue. Even if you have no current knowledge of international trade law, come learn about these hot topics in what is sure to be a lively and interesting discussion. | Justin Becker (Sidley Austin LLP) Stacy Ettinger (K&L Gates) William Isasi (Covington & Burling LLP) Arun Venkataraman (Visa) |
Changing Names and Changing Lives: Partnering with Corporate Legal Departments, Law Firms, and Legal Service Providers to Help Transgender Clients Petition for Legal Name and Gender Marker Changes This workshop will discuss the growing need for pro bono legal services to assist transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming clients with legal name and gender marker changes, and describe a successful partnership model that has been developed to meet that need. The panel, consisting of corporate legal department and law firm leaders and staff from the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund and FreeState Justice, will address the importance of providing these legal services and share their detailed description of how to create a Name and Gender Marker Change Pro Bono Clinic, from start to finish. This discussion will include a focus on the need for thoughtful education around transgender cultural competency issues and how to convince leaders of corporate legal departments and law firms to embrace this important pro bono and diversity and inclusion work. | AC Dumlao (Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund) C.P. Hoffman (National Center for Transgender Equality) Jennedy Johnson (PECO Energy Company) Melissa Lauderdale-Ward (Exelon) Sophia Lee (Blank Rome LLP) Kathy Ochroch (Blank Rome LLP) |
Demands for Religious Accommodation from Non-Discrimination Laws: A Comparative Approach Among the United States and Other Western Democracies The panel will focus on the proliferation of requests for religious accommodation or exemptions from non-discrimination laws over the past several years both in the United States and other Western democracies, and legal responses to those requests. In particular, and of increasing importance to the LGBTQ community in the United States, the Supreme Court is due to consider the scope of religious accommodation in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia next term, where one of the questions presented in the petition for certiorari is whether to revisit Employment Division v. Smith (which held that neutral, generally applicable laws -- like non-discrimination laws -- do not warrant strict scrutiny for purposes of a free exercise / religious accommodation challenge). The decision could have far-ranging consequences across the entire swath of non-discrimination laws and ordinances across the country, and has the potential to eviscerate protections for LGBTQ people. The panel will contrast this with the approach in other countries, including Canada, where the Canada Supreme Court decided the Law Society of British Columbia v. Trinity Western University case eighteen months ago, holding essentially that the non-discrimination aspects of law school license regulations could not be overcome by requests for a religious exemption for Trinity Western. Legal decisions relating to these topics from Australia, Europe, and other western democracies will also be compared and contrasted to the American approach, in the hope that the audience will gain valuable and practical arguments to use in American courts when confronting situations in which LGBTQ persons are threatened by the expansive demands for religious accommodation from non-discrimination laws. | Marci Hamilton (University of Pennsylvania) Robert Leckey (McGill University, Faculty of Law) Jesse Ryan Loffler (Cozen O'Connor) Fred Smith Jr. (Emory University) |
Discrimination on the Governmental Dime This fall, in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, PA, the Supreme Court will hear a case that will determine whether a city government may condition contracts with the city for its foster care system upon compliance with the city's antidiscrimination laws. Viewed most narrowly, the question presented is whether the plaintiff Catholic Social Services has a First Amendment right to city contracts, while disregarding portions of the antidiscrimination rules CSS deems inconsistent with tenets of their faith; in this instance, CSS objects to placing children with LGBTQ families. But broader questions have been posed, including a request that the high court revisit its 1990 decision in Employment Division v. Smith, which held that neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the First Amendment simply because they are inconsistent with an individual's religious beliefs. What does the cert grant mean in this case? What are the stakes? And what does the Court's reexamination of Smith mean in the context of the Court's newer justices and its seemingly altered relationship to precedent? | Praveen Fernandes (Constitutional Accountability Center) Diana Flynn (Lambda Legal) Ashwin Phatak (Constitutional Accountability Center) Rose Saxe (ACLU) Paul Smith (Georgetown University Law Center) |
Dodging Bullets and Jumping Hurdles: Womxn of Color Lawyers, Succeeding through Adversity We will explore some of the hurdles and potholes we have had to jump over and dig out of as well as some of the stereotypes we have had to overcome in order to authentically succeed in the workplace (e.g. quiet Asian, angry Black woman, subservient/hetero feminine woman, misgendering). Queer womxn of color experiencing these issues for the first time in their professional lives or that may have spent time in the trenches will learn strategies for how to deal with the slights, insults, bias and micro-aggressions, and will hear perspectives about how these womxn navigated career crises. We welcome everyone to come and explore these issues with us through a safe and candid dialogue. | Yemi Adegbonmire (The Bail Project) Nona Lee (Arizona Diamondbacks) Angela Lim (Viz.ai, Inc.) Bendita Cynthia Malakia (Hogan Lovells) |
Emerging Trends: Will the Supreme Court Strengthen Religion to Slow LGBTQ+ Advances? For decades, litigators have advanced LGBT rights by appealing to liberty and equality principles expressed in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and their state-law counterparts. These successes, coupled with gains in statutory protections against LGBT discrimination, have motivated groups opposing LGBT equality to adopt new legal arguments. These groups have recently enjoyed a degree of success asserting First Amendment claims that, among other things, have sought to exempt religiously motivated conduct from the reach of nondiscrimination laws. In other cases, the government itself has been complicit in attempting to protect discriminatory conduct, ostensibly based on religious-freedom concerns. For LGBT-allied practitioners facing an unfamiliar landscape, this session provides a short summary of the religion jurisprudence that frames these attacks, discusses some of the ongoing cases typical of these efforts, and discusses both recently decided and upcoming US Supreme Court cases that likely will change the landscape for years to come. Rather than isolated individual presentations, the format primarily will consist of a forward-looking roundtable conversation among the panelists concerning the role of religion in LGBT-rights litigation. Discussion of some specific ongoing cases (e.g., Fulton, Meriwether, Minton) will be included to provide context. Audience questions will be encouraged to help guide the discussion.
Facilitated by Kenneth Upton. | Richard B. Katskee (Americans United for Separation of Church and State) Ayesha Khan (Rock Creek Law, LLC and Potomac Law Group, PLLC) Asaf Orr (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Rose Saxe (ACLU) Adam Unikowsky (Jenner & Block) Kenneth Upton (Americans United for Separation of Church and State) |
Estate Planning: Everything You Need to Know But Didn't Think to Ask! You skipped 'Wills, Trusts & Estates' in law school, but are getting a queasy feeling that your work for your client may have an impact on your client's estate planning issues - but are not sure how, or what to do about it. Or, you're just plain concerned about your own future and the future of key people in your life. Either way, this session is for you! It will provide an overview of basic and more advanced estate planning issues to highlight the things you or your client needs to consider and do, and the impact marriage may have. It will review in particular the basic document tools for estate planning: Healthcare Power of Attorney & Advance Directive; Durable General Power of Attorney; Last Will and Testament; Disposition of Bodily Remains. It will touch on issues relating to the children of LGBT couples, and addresses the impact the SECURE Act has on non-married LGBT couples. It will also address pitfalls and how to avoid them: prenuptial agreements; proper execution of documents; litigation regarding the validity of estate planning documents; guardianship options. Finally, the session will provide a brief overview of public benefits to which your client or client's family members may be entitled (e.g., Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, et al.), and the eligibility requirements for those benefits. The session will provide guidance on how to avoid inadvertently jeopardizing eligibility for public benefits, and provide some alternatives for simple estate planning for low-income individuals and couples. | Dale Noll (Akerman LLP) Brad Richter (Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP) Murray Scheel (Whitman-Walker Legal Services) |
Existing and Thriving as a Trans-femme Attorney Being a trans woman brings with it a set of unique challenges in the workplace that can often be exacerbated for trans-femme attorneys in the legal profession. There are issues of trans-misogyny, the loss of male privilege, imposter syndrome, passing privilege, and microaggressions to name a few. Add to this the layer of being a person of color, and the intersectional issues can be severely compounded. This workshop will focus on the unique challenges faced by trans-femme attorneys both in and out of the courtroom and at different levels of seniority in legal workplaces, and will offer perspectives from lawyers with law firm, government, and nonprofit experience. The panel will also discuss how fellow attorneys can be better allies. | Taylor Brown (ACLU) Alejandra Caraballo (Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund) Jill Rose Quinn (Law Offices of Jill Rose Quinn) Mia Yamamoto (Law Office of Mia Yamamoto) |
Extreme or Essential: Understanding the Shifting Legal Landscape of LGBTQ-specific Community Inclusion in U.S. School Curricula This interactive and highly engaging panel will focus on the ever-shifting (and often groundbreaking) legal landscape regarding recent and future state-level requirements for the inclusion of LGBT-specific curriculum in 5-12 grade classes. Based in part on recent legislative wins in Colorado, Oregon, Illinois, New Jersey, this new fight for inclusion is experiencing a groundswell of support but is also facing historic opposition not seen since marriage equality debates raged through the country which often divided families, communities, and social institutions alike. With laws like "No Promo Homo‚" regulations (laws expressly forbidding teachers to discuss LGBT issues in classrooms) still enshrined into state constitutions across the country, efforts to teach students about the LGBT community's contributions to historical, economic, and social developments throughout time have been consistently stymied. This 'best in class' panel will educate attendees about the intricacies and nuances of proposed future legislation while also examining the impact of current laws on students, educators, and the communities in which they exist. This panel will also explore implementation issues, including state mandates with local school board and district enactment, social issues (similar to marriage equality debates) impacted by homophobia and the false dichotomy of morality versus equality. | Sophia Arredondo (GLSEN (formerly the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network)) Christian Fuscarino (Garden State Equality) Shannon Minter (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Zaylore Stout (Zaylore Stout & Associates, LLC) Diane Thu-Thao Rhodes (Advocates for Youth) |
Family Rights for LGBTQIA+ Folks: U.S. Surrogacy and Parentage Laws Recent debates about surrogacy present some of the most complex and compelling human rights issues of our time - including family rights for LGBTQIA people, ethical issues in assisted reproduction, and race, gender, and disability justice. Surrogacy is a global form of family formation wherein a person agrees to become pregnant and give birth to a child that another person(s) intend to parent. Although often undertaken by infertile different-sex couples, surrogacy is an important form of family formation for the LGBTQIA community. Because surrogacy implicates the rights and interests of multiple stakeholders, it critical to use a human rights framework informed by the values of the reproductive justice, disability rights and justice, and LGBTQIA movements. This panel will explore surrogacy in the U.S. where there are no federal laws and state laws vary widely, ranging from complete bans to some level of authorization. Currently, 18 states permit some forms of surrogacy while four prohibit it. Across the country, state legislatures are actively considering new surrogacy laws. It is critical that these laws incorporate a human rights framing to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected, including persons who act as surrogates. This panel will 1) share the Center's work on surrogacy in the U.S., including a set of human rights-based guiding principles on compensated gestational surrogacy developed it developed to inform proactive state legislative efforts, 2) explain current parentage laws and the role of surrogacy in family formation for the LGBTQIA community, and 3) provide attendees an opportunity to share their experiences with surrogacy. | Denise Brogan-Kator (Family Equality Council) Courtney Joslin (UC Davis School of Law) Cathy Sakimura (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Karla Torres (Center for Reproductive Rights) |
Federal Benefits for LGBTQ+ People and Their Families This session focuses on integrating federal benefits planning into your LGBTQ estate/life planning/elder law or family law consultations. In response to LGBTQ advocacy on same sex marriage, family formation, and gender identity issues, five federal agencies (Social Security Administration, Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services, Office of Personnel Management, Defense Department, and the Veterans Administration) have issued rulings and operational guidelines to benefit us and our families. This review of LGBTQ federal benefits developments will prepare you to advise existing clients and attract new clients who need to understand how they and their families can access benefits. Even if you practice in areas of law other than estate/life/elder planning or family law, this presentation will help you personally, your friends, and your family members access federal safety net support. | Cynthia L. Barrett (Cynthia L. Barrett P.C.) Joan Burda (Joan M. Burda Attorney at Law) Carrington "Rusty" Mead (Carrington Madison Mead, Esq.) Krisztina Szabo (Whitman-Walker Health) |
Fighting The Rise of Anti-LGBTQ+ Legal Groups LGBTQ+ people are under attack. Groups such as the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and Liberty Counsel have litigated for decades against same-sex relationship recognition and parenting, have conducted trainings for thousands of law students and lawyers, and have built a vast network of pro bono attorneys who support their opposition to equality and inclusion - all under the guise of religion. Following the Obergefell decision in 2015, these groups increased and broadened their litigation and policy attacks on LGBTQ+ people, particularly targeting the most vulnerable in our “family,” our transgender youth. Fueled further by the Trump Administration, numerous members of these groups and the legions of attorneys trained by them have now risen to high level positions within the top echelons of government agencies and the federal judiciary. This plenary session will review the rise of power of these anti-LGBTQ+ legal groups and their misuse of religion, and will discuss the threat they pose both to LGBTQ+ people's safety and equality and to the sense of fundamental fairness of a secular legal profession. Attendees will learn actions every lawyer can take to push back against these groups while ensuring that their own legal workplaces are LGBTQ+ inclusive and affirming. | Heron Greenesmith (Political Research Associates) Sharon McGowan (Lambda Legal) Cathy Sakimura (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Brennan Suen (Media Matters) Kasey Suffredini (Freedom For All Americans) |
Health Care Reform in 2020 and Beyond: What's at Stake for LGBTQ+ People? This is a time of tremendous risk and opportunity for LGBTQ people and the health care system. 'Medicare for All' and 'Medicare for All Who Want It' proposals are taking center stage as we head into the 2020 Presidential elections. There is growing awareness among academics, health professional associations and policymakers, of health disparities affecting LGBTQ people and the need for more emphasis on cultural competence in health professional schools and continuing education programs. At the same time, the Trump Administration and many State legislatures are continuing to attack Medicaid and the healthcare rights of LGBTQ people, particularly transgender and nonbinary people. Moreover, after surviving multiple attempts to invalidate the law in Congress and through the courts, the ACA is facing a new challenge in a more conservative Supreme Court. This workshop will examine the Presidential candidates’ proposals for healthcare reform – and opportunities for progress, or more setbacks, on the Hill and in the White House in 2021 and beyond. The panelists will review how LGBTQ people have actually fared under Medicare and Medicaid as they currently exist and what changes would be needed to achieve equal healthcare for all. The workshop will also consider how cost containment issues are essential to the goal of equal access to healthcare. The panelists will also examine the gains for LGBTQ people that have been accomplished through the ACA, and how those might be affected by the pending litigation that seeks to invalidate the entire statute. | Candace Bond-Theriault (National LGBTQ Task Force) Daniel Bruner (Whitman-Walker Health) Sharita Gruberg (Center for American Progress) Jennifer Lav (National Health Law Program) Wayne Turner (National Health Law Program) |
ID Ready or Not?: The New Frontier of Transgender, Non-Binary, and Intersex Identification Document Change Laws in 2020 and Beyond A few short years ago, not a single government-issued ID allowed for a gender-neutral X designation. Now in 2020 almost half the states offer an X designation and many have applicants to self-report their appropriate gender marker. 2020 marks the introduction of our first federal bill to create a third gender marker option, brings the deadline for travelers to obtain a Real ID card to fly domestically, and awaits review from higher courts on a lawsuit fighting to obtaining an 'X'on a federal passport. The issue of proper identification for transgender, non-binary, and intersex people has gotten increased visibility with every year. Our panel of advocates will share the latest news and trends of gender change laws in courts and legislatures across the country and lead a discussion on how access to accurate IDs impacts voting rights, safety and access to facilities, airport security, and more. | Charlie Arrowood (Arrowood Law) Arli Christian (ACLU) AC Dumlao (Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund) Alan York (Reed Smith LLP) |
Intersex Rights, Reproductive Health Care, and Bodily Essentialism: Legislative Considerations Legislative recognition of intersex lives is at an all-time high across the world. interACT: Advocates for Intersex Youth is one of the largest intersex-led legal organization in the US. As activists continue to engage with lawmakers and others responsible for policy impacting this population, increasing awareness has led to an uptick in mention of the "i" without full understandings of how to center the lived realities of intersex people. This lack of common understandings on behalf of those in power regarding best practices to achieve meaningful change for the intersex community include whether advances in intersex rights will negatively impact reproductive health care and how to address attacks on transgender medical care while being mindful of the experience of intersex youth, who are often subjected to harmful medical interventions in infancy. Questions remain including to what extent the impacted group can and should be involved in decision-making, how to allocate resources in an equitable manner, and the impact of trauma on activism and the long term sustainability of a movement thus far underrepresented in LGBTQI legal decision-making spaces. This panel suggests a number of guiding principles to ensure good outcomes, including examples of legislation and related media, as well as potential pitfalls to avoid. | Bria Brown-King (interACT) Alesdair Ittelson (interACT: Advocates for Intersex Youth) Dr. Suegee Tamar-Mattis |
LGBTQ Employment Law in Practice The presenters will focus on practical guidance for employment lawyers on LGBTQ workplace issues, including discussion on the practical impact of the anticipated US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County which will interpret Title VII to either include or exclude LGBTQ individuals from Title VII's protections. | Omar Gonzalez-Pagan (Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.) Brian McGinnis (Fox Rothschild LLP) Denise Visconti (Littler) |
LGBTQ+ Workplace Harassment: Assessing, Investigating, and Litigating Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity-Based Bias in States with Protective Laws In the 22+ states whose laws prohibit workplace harassment because of sexual orientation and gender identity, courts and practitioners must sort out how to apply 'traditional' harassment law to more novel, nuanced issues specific to the LGBTQ+ community. These issues included perceived LGBTQ+ status, outing, misgendering, stereotyping, and denial of gender-inclusive facilities access. The panel's experience will be valuable to lawyers, whether in federal court (should Title VII continue to protect LGBTQ+ workers) or in those states with protective laws. | Connie Montoya (Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP) David Nahmias (Impact Fund) Jenn Protas (Hoge Fenton Jones & Appel) Ilona Turner (Law Offices of Amy Oppenheimer) Shinming Wong (National Center for Lesbian Rights) |
LGBTQIA+ in Big Law: A How-To Guide for Law Students This panel intends to equip LGBTIA+ law students who intend to practice in Big Law with tools that will help them identify a law firm at which they can flourish in their legal practice and formulate an approach to various experiences they may encounter at work, including: navigating social media with work colleagues as "friends" or followers," using identity-affirming pronouns at the office and with clients, bringing one's "authentic self" to the workplace, advocating for inclusive health insurance, and updating one's legal documentation with HR. The panel will also discuss how to identify a mentor to provide guidance regarding such topics. Not for CLE credit. | Arielle Adler (Lowenstein Sandler LLP) Michael Hui (Littler Mendelson P.C.) Anastasia Kaup (Duane Morris LLP) Jay Larry (Bracewell LLP) M. Dru Levasseur (National LGBT Bar Association and Foundation) Alan York (Reed Smith LLP) |
Multi-system Approaches to Ending LGBTQ+ Youth Homelessness Through Law and Policy An estimated 4.2 million youth and young adults up to age 24 experience homelessness each year in the United States, and up to 40 percent of these youth and young adults identify as LGBTQ+. Youth experiencing homelessness - particularly unaccompanied youth, LGBTQ+ youth, and youth of color - face numerous legal barriers to meeting the basic necessities of life and to accessing services. A groundbreaking new 2019 report, the State Index on Youth Homelessness, authored by Dylan Waguespack, True Colors United, and Brandy Ryan, National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty, provides a scorecard of how well state laws and policies address youth homelessness. In this session, participants will learn how a multi-system approach to ending youth homelessness can open doors to homes for youth and young adults in every state. We'll explain how advocates can make their voices heard by reviewing entry-points for advocacy and also what specific improvements advocates should pursue. Additionally, the panel will describe which specific child welfare reforms can stem the flow of LGBTQ+ young people aging out of foster care into homelessness. This session will empower advocates across the country to utilize available tools to better serve LGBTQ+ youth experiencing homelessness. | Currey Cook (Lambda Legal) Dylan Waguespack (True Colors United) Christina Wilson Remlin (Children's Rights) |
Navigating Client Expectations: An Experiential Journey for Diverse Practitioners With a combined 80 years of practice, our panel shares their experiential journey as LGBTQ lawyers over the past three decades. From our beginnings in law through current day, we discuss common challenges and obstacles and how we navigated them to get where we are today. With the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on June 15, 2020 in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, we share our hope for our future. Topics to be covered are: The percentage of LGBTQ lawyers nationally, a cultural comparison over time, coming “out” at work and to clients, business development and in-house opportunities. | Marla Butler (Thompson Hine) Susan Cirilli (Offit Kurman) Jay Larry (Bracewell LLP) Sarah Moore (Fisher Phillips) Katherine Silver (Jackson Walker) |
Out in Leadership: Reflections from LGBTQ+ Law School Deans Law schools play a critical role for the entire legal profession and for our American society, both in training future lawyers in direct legal skills and knowledge, and also in establishing norms for how the next generations of attorneys view their fellow professionals. Law schools help set standards for the rights, responsibilities, and courtesies which should be extended to fellow lawyers, within the legal profession, and by extension, to all people. In expanding their understanding of what policies and practices best support their LGBTQ+ constituencies (whether students, faculty, or administrators), law schools thus have the opportunity to better support those constituencies during their time in the building, and to imbue respect for LGBTQ+ people in all who pass through their doors. Our esteemed panel of current and former LGBTQ+ Dean of law schools will discuss the progress that American legal education has made with respect to LGBTQ+ acceptance and support, will grapple candidly with challenges that still remain including those impacting students and faculty with intersectional identities such as racial minority status and disability, and will suggest routes for productive law school community advocacy. All registered Conference attendees are welcome; law school students, faculty, and administrators are particularly encouraged to attend. Not for CLE credit. | Dean Mary Anne Bobinski (Emory University School of Law) Dean Larry Cunningham (Charleston School of Law) Dean Anthony Niedwiecki (Mitchell Hamline School of Law) Dean Kellye Testy (The Law School Admission Council) |
Pathways to the Judiciary Each year, members of the judiciary come together to discuss their career trajectory and provide advice to young professionals interested in ascending the bench. Representing a diverse array of judges, panelists will discuss both the appointed and elected processes for judges in different jurisdictions as well as ethical guidelines or standards associated with panelists’ paths to becoming judges or retaining their positions. Additionally, the challenges of being an openly LGBT judge, especially in relation to judicial ethics codes, will also be a focus. Members of the International Association of LGBT Judges will be available during and after the session to talk further with attendees. | Judge Linda Giles (Massachusetts Superior Courts) Judge Tiffany Palmer (Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia) Judge Christopher Panos (Circuit Court for Baltimore City) Judge Kristin Rosi (California Department of Insurance) Judge Javier Vargas (Family Court of the State of New York, Kings County) |
Personal Branding for Lawyers This workshop will be a high energy panel discussion of ways that lawyers of any level can leverage the principles of personal branding to build a successful practice. The panelists will specifically discuss using LinkedIn as a platform in various ways to get clients, become a thought leader, grow your network, and build your tribe. The panel will provide examples of strategies that have worked for them and the career opportunities that have arisen by harnessing their unique voice and perspective. The panelists will talk through techniques for promoting an LGBTQ-specific practice for solo practitioners, small firm attorneys, and Big Law lawyers whose niche includes LGBTQ+ competencies. Panelists will also discuss the distinctions between branding to build a practice versus branding and marketing when considering a lateral leap. Not for CLE credit. | Deian McBryde (McBryde Law LLC) Nathan Peart (Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC) Sara Tucker (Womble Bond Dickinson) |
Protecting LGBTQ+ Voters in 2020 Our panelists will participate in a moderated discussion spotlighting current and emerging political legal issues that will impact the upcoming 2020 Presidential election, with a particular focus on voting rights and election administration issues affecting LGBTQ+ voters and the LGBTQ+ community. The panel will discuss the following topics: 1) Emerging affecting voters who are nonbinary, transgender, and other members of the LGBTQ+ community. We will highlight examples from states that making progressive changes in this area. We will also discuss those states putting up obstacles against the voting rights of the LGBTQ+ community. 2) Voting rights litigation update. We will provide an overview of important cases, both resolved and pending, heading into the election. The panel will focus on cases and developments that impact homeless voters, youth voters, and/or elderly voters, all of whom tend to be among the most at-risk LGBTQ community members. 3) Briefing on corporate political engagement. We will examine the trend in corporate political engagement toward using brand resources to have a voice in moral and social issues and act in favor of voting rights and access to the ballot for at-risk communities. 4) Campaign finance and election administration updates. We will supplement the discussion of pending cases with an overview of any campaign finance and/or election law issues outside of the litigation context that are making news this summer in the lead up to the fall general election. Together we will lead a discussion of these emerging issues based on the experience and expertise that we have built during the course of interacting with clients, voters, and policy experts engaged in the 2020 election. | Hal Brewster (Perkins Coie LLP) Rachana Desai Martin (Biden for America) Tyler Hagenbuch (Perkins Coie LLP) Ben Needham (Human Rights Campaign) |
Proud At Work: The Power of Employee Resource Groups Employee Resource Groups (ERGs - also often called "affinity groups") have long been the center for employee-driven diversity, equity, and inclusion work within law firms and companies. An increasing number of workplaces are recognizing the value ERGS, including those for LGBTQ+ employees, bring to the table in supporting employees with diverse identities and ensuring that the firm/company has state-of-the-art policies and procedures in place to improve employee recruitment and retention efforts.
This engaging and interactive workshop will cover:
* How to start an ERG
* How to determine and support the appropriate mission for your ERG
* How to harness the power of your ERG to advance pro-LGBTQ+ initiatives within your firm or company
* How to move your ERG to a BRG (Business Resource Group)
* How allies can make an impact in an ERG's work
and much more. Join us, and be part of encouraging your fellow LGBTQ+ legal professionals to bring their full and authentic selves to your workplace. Facilitated by Tiffany Chang and Anastasia Kaup.
Not for CLE credit.
| Tiffany Chang (Crowell & Moring LLP) Anastasia Kaup (Duane Morris LLP) John LeCrone (Davis Wright Tremaine) Scott Morgan (Thomson Reuters) Lauren Mutti (Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits) |
Quashing Hope: A Review of Recent Efforts to Disrupt the Participation of LGBTQ+ Individuals in the U.S. Foster Care System and their Forming of Families Through Adoption In November 2019, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services proposed a rule amendment that weakens protections afforded by the Obama Administration to LGBTQ individuals seeking to foster or adopt children, as well as the children themselves. Similar efforts are underway at the state and local level, including through litigation, such as Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, No. 18-2574, which is scheduled to be argued in the U.S. Supreme Court in the upcoming term. If successful, these efforts would significantly impede the placement and permanency of thousands of children in the homes of loving families. As of 2018, there were 437,283 children in foster care, of which 125,422 children were waiting to be adopted. A significant number of these children were fostered and/or ultimately adopted by LGBTQ individuals. Indeed, recent statistics show that over 138,000 same-sex couples are raising adopted children, and over 18,500 same-sex couples serve as foster care parents. Statistics also show that between 2 million and 3.7 million children under age 18 have an LGBTQ parent, of which approximately 200,000 are being raised by same-sex couples. In addition to adversely impacting the placement of children, these efforts pose significant and long-term risks for children. By reducing the pool of qualified parents, children in foster care are more likely to age-out of the system; and upon doing so, face a significantly higher incidence of homelessness, chronic unemployment, and incarceration. This workshop will explore the vital roles that LGBTQ individuals play in our foster care system and adoption community and will address the deleterious impact that recent legal efforts may have on pathways to permanency for our youth, particularly our LGBTQ youth. Another workshop will delve into the related legal issues. | Marcy Chell (Child and Family Services Agency) Cynthia Cubbage (The Barker Adoption Foundation) Douglas Dreier (Wiley Rein LLP) Holly Goldmann (Casa Ruby) Antonio Reynolds (Wiley Rein) |
Same-Sex Couples, Marital Children, and Birthright Citizenship Thousands of same-sex couples in the United States are raising children. They may adopt or use alternative reproduction technology (ART) to bring children into their lives. Some use gestational surrogacy - an expensive proposition in the United States - to become parents. As such, numerous couples have taken advantage of surrogacy options abroad in order to bring children. A person automatically becomes a citizen since birth if they are born in the United States or if they derive citizenship from their parents, as prescribed by law. In enacting the Immigration and Nationality Act, Congress linked a child's ability to derive citizenship from their parents to marriage and made it part of the 'constellation of benefits' that cannot be denied to same-sex couples under the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell. Thus, the marital children born abroad to same-sex couples ought to be recognized as United States citizens since birth, if at least one of the parents is a U.S. citizen. However, the U.S. Department of State refuses to recognize the children of married same-sex couples as marital children, thereby making it harder for them to obtain citizenship. In this workshop, participants will learn about the cases challenging the Department of State's policy to require a 'biological relationship' with both parents in order to be recognized as a marital child - a requirement that has no footing in the text of the law - as well as about the harmful impact of this policy on families headed by same-sex couples. | Susan Baker Manning (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP) Omar Gonzalez-Pagan (Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.) Aaron Morris (Immigration Equality) Cathy Sakimura (National Center for Lesbian Rights) |
Silver Pride: Aunt Samantha Wants YOU to Advocate for LGBTQ+ Elders They're the 'Greatest Generation' of our movement: LGBT elders who fought and courageously survived through, Stonewall, the rise of the HIV epidemic, and countless backlashes. Now in their 'golden years,' however, they often face more significant challenges than straight or cisgender elders and those living without HIV. They are far more likely to face the challenges as they age without the support of a partner or children; are far more likely to have a disabling condition; and more likely to live in poverty. They also face the prospect of having to 're-closet' if they need to enter a nursing home. In this session, you will learn legislative and litigation strategies to advocate with and for your LGBT elders in your own community, on the local and state level. We will discuss cutting-edge model legislation for getting your state Office on Aging to target resources specifically at the needs of LGBT and HIV positive elders. We will also discuss model legislation for creating a 'Bill of Rights' specifically for LGBT and HIV positive nursing home residents, to strengthen protections against discrimination in those settings. Finally, we will provide an update on recent litigation efforts to protect LGBT and HIV positive older people. | M. Geron Gadd (AARP Foundation) Murray Scheel (Whitman-Walker Legal Services) Shelly Skeen (Lambda Legal) Aaron Tax (SAGE USA) |
Strolling the Halls of Power: Interjurisdictional Lessons from the Legislative Efforts to Decriminalize Sex Work As public support for sex work decriminalization grows, we can expect more states and local jurisdictions to seek to reform laws around sex work. In this workshop, panelists will discuss lessons from the legislative efforts in New York, and Washington, DC to decriminalize sex work. These advocates from these early jurisdictions will describe the strategic considerations required by their distinct political and legal landscapes. We can expect to hear stories from the field, the challenges and victories, and examples of the practice of law in advancing social movements. | Benjamin Brooks (Whitman-Walker Health) Chinyere Ezie (Center for Constitutional Rights) Leila Raven (Hacking/Hustling) Jared Trujillo (Association of Legal Aid Attorneys (UAW Local 2325)) |
Supreme Court Review: The Blockbuster 2019-2020 Term In addition to the Title VII cases, the Supreme Court heard an unusually large number of high-profile cases this past term, addressing issues ranging from DACA and other immigration issues, gun control, the insanity defense, presidential privilege, race and age discrimination, religious freedom, reproductive freedom, unanimous juries, unfaithful electors, and more. This panel will review the decisions issued during the 2019-2020 term, examine what those rulings reveal about the impact of having a majority conservative justices on the Court, and preview the cases teed up for decision next term.
| Sunu Chandy (National Women's Law Center) Alexander Chen (Harvard Law School) Jon W. Davidson (Freedom For All Americans) Rachel Shalev (Orrick) Paul Smith (Georgetown University Law Center) |
Swipe Right: Health Care Privacy in the Era of Smart Devices and Digital Health Health care privacy is a big deal. Deciding what to disclose to your health care provider is one thing; sharing that information with your employer or grandmother is another. In our age of big data, wearable technology, and transnational mega-mergers, health care privacy is just one breach away from being embarrassing publicity. Even sooner than the breach point, privacy is a defining issue for many LGBTQ people when determining whether to seek and receive health care, such as preventative care and substance abuse treatment, or downloading a health tracking application, or switching from a physical to an electronic pharmacy. This panel will discuss four major privacy laws that address health information (HIPAA; 42 CFR Part 2; GINA; CCPA) using real-world examples, interactive polling, and cybersecurity tips applicable to LGBTQ health care consumers and attorneys who counsel LGBTQ clients and community organizations. | Cameron Faber (Los Angeles LGBT Center) Greg Fosheim (Moderator) (McDermott Will & Emery LLP) Sumaya Noush (Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP) Colin Wright (Landis+Gyr) |
Tax-Exempt Vehicles for Grassroots and Emerging LGBTQ+ Advocates This workshop will give attorneys practical tools for supporting grassroots LGBTQ+ initiatives in their home communities and beyond; specifically, we will explore the role attorneys can play in helping activists and organizers obtain the benefits of federal tax-exempt status. We will compare the option of creating a new 501(c)(3) entity with the alternative of housing emerging initiatives within an existing fiscal sponsor. Because fiscal sponsorship arrangements can be established with relative ease, they allow newly established entities or initiatives to grow and operate with the same tax benefits as established organizations; they also allow organizers to create time-limited initiatives in response to current events (e.g. advocacy for/against specific policy proposals; initiatives in response to man-made or natural disasters) or in commemoration of historical events (e.g. "XYZ 50th Anniversary Gala"). We will review case studies of how the LGBTQ+ movement has used fiscal sponsorship to incubate mainstream movement actors (e.g. state-level marriage equality organizations), intersectional activism (e.g. LGBT POC organizations), and issue-specific initiatives (e.g. state-level opposition to conversion therapy). The workshop will discuss key legal and operational issues when creating fiscal sponsorship arrangements, including drafting tips for Fiscal Sponsorship Agreements. Nonprofit leaders who have operated as fiscal sponsors for LGBTQ+ initiatives will also share their experiences and best practices. | Glenn Magpantay (National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance) Jason Qu (DC Bar Pro Bono Center) |
The Battle to Protect Asylum: How Advocates are Fighting for the Rights of LGBTQ+ Asylum Seekers at the Border and in the Interior The current administration continues to implement policies that harm individuals seeking refuge in the United States at our southern border and interior. The harm inflicted by these policies disproportionately effects vulnerable populations, such as the LGBTQ community. LGBTQ asylum seekers at our southern border are either forced to wait in Mexico via the Migrant Protection Protocol (MPP) and metering policies, where they face threats and violence or if permitted to enter, are being detained in facilities with declining health and safety conditions. Even LGBTQ asylum seekers who are not detained and in the United States, face significant backlogs in the immigration courts and asylum office as well as changing regulations that put their eligibility for asylum at risk. Hear from attorneys about representing LGBTQ immigrants in this current climate, pending litigation fighting against the administration's cruel immigration policies, and ways in which you can support LGBTQ asylum seekers. | Sharita Gruberg (Center for American Progress) Aaron Morris (Immigration Equality) Keren Zwick (National Immigrant Justice Center) |
The Criminalization of Disease: Lessons from HIV, Hepatitis, and COVID-19 This panel will look at the long history of the criminalization of People Living with HIV, and the more recent applications of the criminal law to people living with Hepatitis and in the context of the COVID 19 pandemic. Panelists will discuss the impact that HIV criminal laws have had on Black people, people of color more generally, transgender people, and sex workers. In addition, the panel will discuss specific law and policy reforms that can be implemented at the local, state and federal level. | Eric Paulk (Georgia Equality) Amir Sadeghi (Center for HIV Law and Policy) Bamby Salcedo (bambysalcedo.com) Brad Sears (Moderator) (Williams Institute) |
The Fifth Anniversary of Obergefell: How We Won and What We Lost On the fifth anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), this panel brings together key players in that triumph to consider (1) why we won nationwide marriage equality so quickly after smashing defeats between 1996 and 2004; (2) what have been the negative as well as positive consequences of that landmark decision; and (3) what Obergefell has meant for LGBTQ+ rights in the long run. | Mary Bonauto (GLAD) Alphonso David (Human Rights Campaign) William Eskridge (Yale University) Shannon Minter (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Sayre Reece (National LGBTQ Task Force) Christopher R. Riano (Center for Civic Education) |
The State of Housing Law: Affordable Housing Policy and Development for LGBTQ Communities LGBT communities continue to face high rates of discrimination when seeking increasingly limited affordable housing. This discrimination is compounded by the ongoing Federal and legal regulations that continue to shift in the beginning of 2020. This presentation will focus on fair housing law and housing discrimination from the policy perspective, including recent legislative/regulatory changes; key legal considerations around developing housing using the Low Income Housing Tax Credits for LGBTQ people; and the barriers, needs, and best practices to provide affirming and safe housing for LGBTQ elders and youth for advocates and developers. Join a group of legal, policy, and advocacy players to discuss ways to protect and advocate for deeply vulnerable LGBTQ communities under the current legislative and housing landscape. | Sydney Kopp-Richardson (SAGE) Sasha Samberg-Champion (Relman Colfax PLLC) Randall Shorr (Randall B. Shorr Attorney at Law) Jorge Soto (National Fair Housing Alliance) |
The Struggles Faced by Incarcerated Transgender, Gender Non-conforming, Intersex and Non-binary People: Effective Reforms for Jails and Prisons Thousands of transgender, gender non-conforming, intersex and non-binary people are incarcerated in jails and prisons across the country. They face unique challenges and and disproportionate abuse while they are incarcerated. Extensive published studies on conditions of confinement for incarcerated transgender people confirm that this population is one of, if not the most, vulnerable population of incarcerated people. Surveys repeatedly show overwhelming experiences of sexual assault, violence, and harassment against incarcerated transgender people because of one's perceived or actual gender identity or sexual orientation. Our own data and client anecdotes confirm this: virtually all of our incarcerated transgender clients housed in facilities not aligned with their gender identity have experienced some form of sexual assault, violence, or harassment based on their gender identity or expression. This panel will focus on those unique challenges, provide best practice tips for practitioners directly representing incarcerated TGNCINB people, and use the NYC Department of Correction as a case study in the types of reforms which have been successful, and those that have not been successful. The panelists are all NYC based advocates who have been working on reforming the NYC Department of Correction for years. | Ceyenne Doroshow (G.L.I.T.S.) Lynly S. Egyes (Transgender Law Center) Mik Kinkead (The Legal Aid Society) Deborah Lolai (Bronx Defenders) Elizabeth Munsky (New York City Department of Correction) |
Title VII and Beyond: The Scope of Civil Rights Protections in the Aftermath of Bostock/Stephens/Zarda On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in the combined cases of Bostock v. Clayton County (“Bostock”), R. G. & G. R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. (“Stephens”) and Altitude Express, Inc., et al. v. Zarda et al. (“Zarda”), confirming that the prohibition on discrimination on the basis of “sex” contained in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes a prohibition against both gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination. The impact of this ruling upon LGBTQ+ people in America cannot be overstated: 16% of LGBT people report having lost a job due to their sexual orientation or gender identity, yet 25 states and three U.S. territories have no explicit state law employment protections for LGBTQ+ people. This win is monumental since now LGBTQ+ individuals across the country have clear workplace federal civil rights protections. Yet this does not bring an end to the work. Our panel will analyze the combined Bostock/Stephens/Zarda opinion, discuss its broad impact on the LGBTQ+ community, and talk about next frontiers in the fight for full equality under our current laws and beyond.
Facilitated by Nan Hunter. | Sunu Chandy (National Women's Law Center) Alexander Chen (Harvard Law School) James Esseks (ACLU) Nan Hunter (Georgetown University Law Center) Sharon McGowan (Lambda Legal) |
Training, Trainings, and More Trainings? Advancing LGBTQ+ Equity and Access to Justice through Professional Development for Law Schools, Private Firms, and Court Systems Continuing Legal Education (CLE) is a fundamental component of life as a judge, attorney, or legal professional. When it comes to advancing LGBTQ+ equity and access to justice, ongoing professional development requires not only expanding one's knowledge of substantive areas of law and the enhancement of practical skills but also deepening one's awareness of the diversity within LGBTQ+ lived experience and the growing of one's cultural competency, diversity awareness, and inclusion best practices. These needs also exist for jurists, practitioners, and professionals who are themselves members of LGBTQ+ communities. This session discusses model trainings offered in a range of settings to diverse audiences including law schools (faculty and students), private firms and corporations, courts, and bar associations. | Arielle Adler (Lowenstein Sandler LLP) Lisa Burke (New Jersey Judiciary Administrative Office of the Courts) M. Dru Levasseur (National LGBT Bar Association and Foundation) Jean-Marie Navetta (PFLAG) Nicole Seawright (City of Philadelphia Law Department) |
Using State and Federal Law To Safeguard Transgender Inclusion in Sports While attacks against transgender athletes are raging across the country, attorneys and sports inclusion strategists are working on litigation, messaging, and policy to affirmatively protect the rights of trans athletes to participate in sports. In this workshop will discuss litigation and messaging strategies for cutting through the legal arguments, divisive rhetoric, junk science, and dated stereotypes used by opponents of transgender athletes. We will also discuss an ongoing case being litigated by Gender Justice on behalf of an athlete who was banned from participating in powerlifting competitions. Led by a civil rights litigator and a sports inclusion strategist who are both passionate about athletics, we will also discuss relevant state and federal caselaw, recent bills sweeping through the country attacking transgender athletes, and the policy landscape within professional sports organizations such as the NCAA, Crossfit, and the International Olympic Committee. | Gabriel Arkles (ACLU) Jess Braverman (Gender Justice) Ashland Johnson (Inclusion Playbook) Chris Mosier (TransAthlete.com) |
Visibilizing Bisexuals in LGBTQIA+ Rights Discourse and Communities While so-called gay marriage, other same-sex partnership issues, and more recently, transgender issues, have become more prominent in legal discourse, the experiences and lives of bisexual people are rarely explicitly considered in social and legal narratives, despite the fact that bisexuals comprise more than half of the LGBTQIA+ community and are among our most marginalized in terms of discrimination and poverty rates. | Diana Adams (Chosen Family Law Center, Inc.) Lisa Burke (New Jersey Judiciary Administrative Office of the Courts) William Crosby (Interpublic Group) Judge Mike Jacobs (State of Georgia) Ezra Young (Law Office of Ezra Young) |
What's Left for Transgender Rights After Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC Join our panel of leading transgender litigators, policy aficionados, and scholars to dissect the Supreme Court's hotly anticipated blockbuster opinion in Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC. Though the question presented in Harris appears narrow - whether transgender people are protected by federal laws prohibiting sex discrimination in employment - the opinion itself is poised to be far-reaching. | Alexander Chen (Harvard Law School) Diana Flynn (Lambda Legal) Jennifer Levi (GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders) Shannon Minter (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Victoria Rodriguez Roldan (AIDS United) Ezra Young (Law Office of Ezra Young) |
Why Trans Kids, Why Now: The Reactionary Attack on Transgender Rights This past legislative session state legislatures were inundated by an unprecedented and widespread legislative attack on trans youth. From criminalizing doctors for providing medically necessary treatment to transgender youth to excluding transgender youth from participating in sports, conservative legislators have laid bare a coordinated strategy to deny the transgender community, especially trans youth, equal protection under the law. Most of those bills have failed despite the cruelty of this political environment. This panel will explore these bills from a range of perspectives: organizers and lobbyists who fought these bills, the lawyers challenging the bills should they become law, and the research on the individuals and organizations behind this slate of hate. | Alejandra Caraballo (Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund) Heron Greenesmith (Political Research Associates) Asaf Orr (National Center for Lesbian Rights) Allison Scott (Campaign for Southern Equality) Libby Skarin (ACLU of South Dakota) |